tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31783628.post5864116388257643742..comments2024-02-21T06:57:22.256-05:00Comments on Unemployed Negativity: Affect and/or Emotions: Differentiation or Dialecticunemployed negativityhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01251742512967070290noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31783628.post-82783700003743596982015-06-17T17:07:40.659-04:002015-06-17T17:07:40.659-04:00I did not mean to castigate all science, or work o...I did not mean to castigate all science, or work on the intersection of philosophy and science. My point was just that the relationship has to be something more than just showing how some scientific study confirms what a philosopher thought. It seems that such arguments efface the fundamental difference of philosophy and science in terms of both their grounds and effects. unemployed negativityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01251742512967070290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31783628.post-28570327884762914502015-06-17T16:12:24.546-04:002015-06-17T16:12:24.546-04:00Hey Jason,
would you please care to explain what ...Hey Jason,<br /><br />would you please care to explain what do you find the intersection of science and philosophy uninteresting? In the last couple of years there has been an huge expansion of continental philosophy's (and critical theory's) engagement with science, and, i too have never been very interested in it ...<br /><br />Thank you,<br />Mikkomikkohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10076251606952638092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31783628.post-41083285801659072522014-03-23T15:21:20.994-04:002014-03-23T15:21:20.994-04:00Yes, I read the book, but quickly and do not recal...Yes, I read the book, but quickly and do not recall it that much. I have never much been interested in the "scientists agree with what some philosopher said" argument. unemployed negativityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01251742512967070290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31783628.post-77612741789271017532014-03-22T22:18:49.365-04:002014-03-22T22:18:49.365-04:00Have you ever read Antonio Damasio? In "Looki...Have you ever read Antonio Damasio? In "Looking for Spinoza" he makes a distinction in his neurobiological research (his terms were "emotion" for affection and "feeling" for a conscious passion) that might be similar to these distinctions. I read it a few years ago, but I sort of recall that for him, the distinction was also somewhat trivial - that all "emotions" either reverberate until they become "feelings", or they die without much effect.Jo Glidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17537995617381460013noreply@blogger.com